Retail Trading Areas & The Post-Cookie World


Today there’s a big… huge… enormous elephant in the rooms of advertising and marketing: the death of cookie-based digital marketing.  Scant discussion on the topic is due to one simple reason: no one really knows how to solve for the problem.  The most popular answer tossed around by ad agency illuminati seems to be to ditch bottoms up digital attribution models and return to relying only on media mix modeling for planning/execution.  


Really?  The answer is to go back to the standard from the analog TV-dominant era?   The fact that Facebook does not share sufficient data to make this plausible is completely ignored…unless you’re planning to drop Facebook and Instagram entirely from your plans.


Let’s take a step back for some perspective.


Back in the good old days, the advent of TV as the dominant marketing medium pushed ad agencies to research, plan, purchase, and evaluate media plans from a macro (national) level. A highly homogenous society watched the same portfolio of content on 3 dominant networks.  There was an audit process for the odd occasion when a national show under-delivered in a few local markets, but those were the exceptions that proved the rule.  


In that world, ratings and demographics were everything:

·        Ratings generated by Nielsen from a small sample of households, projected to reflect the entire nation

·        Demographic breakdowns of program audiences to allow marketers to narrow their selection of content for ad placement, allowing for affordable TV investment


By the end of that era (circa 2011), cable/satellite fragmentation of TV audiences had killed the golden goose: inability to achieve any affordable reach over 50%, with massively excessive ad frequency delivered in over-saturated commercial pods.

Then along came streaming and digital advertising, with their new definition of an “impression” (:01 screentime; 50% pixilation) and “cookies” that enabled unique user identification and attribution.


Cookies also allowed the industry to double-down on the practice of nationally based planning and execution.  This fueled a massive expansion of ad tonnage, since digital impressions were cheap, clients wanted ever-lower CPMs, and tonnage meant more fees for the buying agencies.


Just a couple of problems with all of this.


1)     Massive digital content fragmentation among a much more diverse consumer universe has resulted in a non-monolithic marketplace. Content consumption in TV markets can vary considerably from the national average, and community-based consumption within markets can vary from their own market average. National programmatic buys have no formal audit process to ensure equal delivery among markets, a critical issue especially for multi-unit retailers.

2)     Cookies came with a price: pushing the boundaries of nascent or non-existent PII rules among consumer/government oversight agencies, until the inevitable pushback came.


Future solutions depend on our ability to recognize the primacy of the retail trading area.   Understanding consumers through the prism of the trading areas where they live/work is the key to finding effective solutions.  Daily consumer behavior (migration; retail traffic; content consumption) is highly related to three factors specific in each trading area: density; local competitors; demographic composition.


Because of this, behavioral segmentation, based on what consumers are actually doing every day in trading areas across the country, becomes the primary research/planning tool.  Other segmentation analysis (demographic; psychographic) are secondary, and only engaged after the geographic, behaviorally-qualified audiences are confirmed.  


How can this local consumer behavior be measured, while still adhering to stricter PII guidelines?  

The key is looking at the smartphone as a consumer avatar: capturing and analyzing the device’s behavior as representing a consumer, without the ingestion of any privacy/identification data.  


Two companies that are using anonymized device data for client solutions are and Intuizi.  Both platforms focus on device behavior within retail trading areas, but there are critical differences:


> follows a “Nielsen”methodology: its universe consists of ~30 million devices (~7% of the 400 million active U.S. devices); data is analyzed and projected to specific trading areas.  Their sample size likely does not reflect geographic variance to ensure projectability in any individual trading area.  They provide consumer insights data only.


>Intuizi’s data base is comprised of ~380 million devices (95% of total), with the ability to drill down to any specific trading area for analysis on non-projected, real-time data.  Intuizi can provide consumer insights data and analysis, along with the ability to activate marketing plans through the client’s agency team, or directly through Intuizi’s DMP partners.    


The means to solve for the post-cookie world are out there, but will require CMOs and agencies to think differently from the conventional wisdom of the cookie-myopic 1st decade of digital.  


Or, to coin a phrase, we need to act globally by analyzing locally.



More Articles

April 14, 2021
The Value of Working with Pseudonymized Mobile Phone Data

The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) are changing the way companies can collect, store, process, and utilize data about individuals.

Dave Katz

April 14, 2021
Interactive Mobile Advertising: A Boon for Advertisers

Interactive mobile advertising (iMA), which enables users to interact with a mobile advertisement and then have their phones automatically connect them to the advertised business, can be an excellent way to connect with potential customers.

Dave Katz

April 14, 2021

Intuizi takes a different approach to geo-fencing. Intuizi’s belief is once the consumer has reached a geo-fence they have already made up their purchase intent. Read more to find out how!

Isabella Pescatello

may 14, 2013

It is important to understand that the only company that has marketing rights to a consumer is the consent owner who received the original consent from the consumer during a sign-up process to their product or service. Intuizi has a patent-pending process to preserve this process between the consent owner and the marketer

Isabella Pescatello

may 14, 2013

Companies may use location-driven market intelligence to gain a better knowledge and more nuanced insight into the outcomes of previous marketing activities and how they affected the company's success indicators.

Isabella Pescatello

may 14, 2013

Intuizi is among the leading location data providing platform with expertise in marketing analytics, data aggregation, audience activation intelligence tools, and branding.

Isabella Pescatello

Request a your
Demo Today

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.